水多的杰伊的: 橙色
2007年1月24日 Tim
水多的杰伊的 是一个重击者在纸产业,因此您知道他们的奉献物包括基本的味道: 草莓、蓝莓和(当然)桔子。
| theFreshScent产品重述要点 | |
|---|---|
| 类别 | 纸 |
| 公司 | ZenSmoke |
| 做 | 西班牙 |
| 赞成 | 抽烟很好,更好的胶浆 |
| 负面因素 | 没有真正的口味或气味 |
| 价格 | $2.49 |
| tFS规定值 | 7.0/10 |
胶浆在空气紧的封印有甜口味并且与锁很好结合。 每个组装是规则水多的样式,估量在1 ¼”并且举行32片叶子。
每通常,烟的气味是一样不可能验明的象口味。 什么都真正地不跳出,它是您典型的水多的杰伊的提供。 是一样大的,象他们,我希望认为他们在这个部门将有潜力擅长,但这些文章轻微地短小落以这个基本的果子味道。
水多的杰伊的: 棒棒糖
2006年11月27日 亚历克斯
很好,感恩是结束的和那它正式地是圣诞节季节的开始的手段。 为什么不开始以假日款待? 言… 水多的杰伊的 棒棒糖纸?
| theFreshScent产品重述要点 | |
|---|---|
| 类别 | 纸 |
| 公司 | ZenSmoke |
| 做 | 西班牙 |
| 赞成 | 假日欢呼? |
| 负面因素 | 能有微弱的胶浆 |
| 价格 | $2.00 |
| tFS规定值 | 6.5/10 |
这明显地不是其中一位水多的大卖主,但是为某一假日欢呼凉快的。 看纸行混合事(很好,除了极热的烟肉味道)好的和给它的顾客一些季节性品种。
水多的杰伊的: 极热的烟肉
2006年8月17日 Tim
There are just some things in this world that shouldn’t exist and bacon-flavored paper is one of them. Do yourself a favor and don’t buy these papers, don’t recommend them to friends and don’t even use them on your enemies. Well… maybe your enemies.
Juicy Jay’s: Blackberry Brandy
August 7th, 2006 by Alex
The brandy offsets the sweetness, creating a nice blend that will stimulate all of your taste buds. Smoke-ability is generally above average with Blackberry Brandy as tFS has yet to find any with a bad batch of glue. If you’re a fan of powerful flavors, Juicy Jay’s has done you right on this one.
Juicy Jay’s: Green Apple
August 4th, 2006 by Alex
Juicy Jay’s: Marshmallow
August 2nd, 2006 by Alex
These Jay’s papers match up with the rest of their kin by measuring 3″ x 1.75″ and containing 50 leaves per booklet. The burn is even, the glue is strong, and the papers have marshmallows on them. If you’re looking for something different that isn’t going to mess with the taste of your smoke, this is a nice change of pace.
Juicy Jay’s: Fudge
July 28th, 2006 by Alex
Oh So Scientific
July 28th, 2006 by Alex
Today I was doing my usual browsing goodness, looking at old and new products, when something caught my attention. Elements Rice Papers (which happen to have the cheesiest tag line ever, but that’s for another day) actually put together a product comparison test to show off how much better their papers burn. Now, I’m all for well thought out and non-biased tests run by a host company, but it never seems to turn out that way.
Most frequently, the companies doing these “comparisons” slant the test to get favorable results. If you pay attention, this one by Elements falls into the slanted category too. Why would you compare thin, rice based papers to any regular old brand? What does this tell me? That papers designed to be thinner are thinner? Way to go guys. Instead, they should run the test against something similar that would actually create an apples to apples comparison. Some good papers to test Elements against would be Smoking King Size - Reds, Eco, or De Luxe.
This graphic and the test behind it are nothing more than eyecandy - looks pretty on the outside but doesn’t mean a damn thing overall.



















