بيتيّ | موقعات أخيرة | صفحات
« بعد ذلك: [فيسن] و [نورمل], [ولّ فريند] دائما | سابقة: [مشنيكس] شعبيّة - قنب البروز فائقة »
هنا فيديو ممتعة يهوّى على تلفزيون بريطانيّة أنّ يكون يكون كسبت شعبيّة عبر إنترنت.
هو ليس ال أكثر علميّا قطعة صحيحة بحث على الكوكب, غير أنّ يوضّح هو النقطة أنّ ربّما يقود بينما رجم ليس مثل خطرة بما أنّ كلّ شخص يجعل هو خارجا أن يكون. التوافق الآراء أنّ يصحّح يلد جرعة الحالة جنون اضطهاد بعد يدخّن يزاد تركيز في السائقة. على النقف جانب, يقود بينما صنع سكرانة ك أكثر مسؤولة أن يأخذ أخطار.
النتيجة أخيرة أنّ كلّ شخص يتلقّى عتبة مختلفة. يقترح المضيفة أيضا شكل الإختبار أنّ يحسب خارجا [هوو موش] عشب أحد ما قد دخّن. حظ جيّدة مع أنّ.
هكذا, كيف السائقة يتمّ رجم يقارن إلى صاحية? أنت ستضطرّ راقبت أن يجد خارجا…
« Next: Visine and NORML, Best Friends Forever | Previous: Popular Mechanics - Hemp the Super Crop »
Home | Recent Posts | Pages
Exit the Mobile Edition (view the standard browser version).
Powered by WordPress. WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
عشوائيّة أوصلت يختبر لقنّب هنديّ الآن يكون في تسمانيا, أستراليا. شرطة يمكن أن يختبر سائقات' لعاب والعقوبة لقراءة إيجابيّة تعليق ال [ليسنس]. هو بدا هو ليس ضروريّة أن يكون تحت التأثير من العقار [أت ث تيم وف] يختبر أن يرجع [بوستيف رسولت].
رغم أنّ قنّب هنديّ إستعمال وامتلاك ليس جائز في تسمانيا, ليس أنا مدركة أنّ أيّ أخرى حشوات يكون أحضرت ضدّ أنّ الذي يفشل. عشوائيّة عقار وفيت يختبر أيضا يكون في يزيد رقم المكان عمل, حيث هناك يمكن كنت حد مقبولة للوجود من [ا نومبر وف] عقارات, وإن كان جدّا بانخفاض. يميل سياسة بعد نحو الصفرة احتمال نهاية من المقياس, ويعمل على الافتراض أنّ كلّ شخص الذي يستعمل عقارات حاجات بعض شكل من [كونسلّينغ] أو تدخل. يبدو هناك بعد أن يكون [ا لوت] الحالة جهل حول هو. أنا أعرف من أحد ما الذي "عقار تربية" في ال [وورك بلس] تضمّن كراس لامعة أيّ عدّل "يمكن موت" ك [سد فّكت] من حشيش إستعمال. أبدا ال بعض, يختبر يمكن, [أت ث فري لست], ساعدت إلى [رس] حالة وعي حول ترفيهيّة عقار إستعمال في ال [لونغ-ترم].
ب [تريش] على 2006-12-01 في 8:32 بعد الظّهر
أنا أدخّن قنّب هنديّ بانتظام وعندما يتيح إلى يأخذ ي يقود إختبار, فكّر أنا `حق, [إيم] يعطي هو فوق لشهر سلفا, شر جيّدة على الإختبار'. أنا أدرت أن ينقص إلى ربّما واحدة يشارك مفصل فلق [ا] أسبوع لأربعة أسابيع, أخذ إختباري و [فيلد] هو. هكذا عمل أنا حتّى هو ثانية وفكّر `[إي] على نحو أفضل يحصل من هو ثانية, أدار أن يبقى باتّجاه آخر للأسبوع من قبل و [فيلد] هو ثانية. the third time, i thought ‘Forget it, im making too big an issue about it’ and had a smoke a few hours before my test and passed it with less errors than previously as I was concentrating so much more. I dont drive regularly and havent driven whilst stoned since (I think, its hard to remember!) as I dont think that driving a giant lump of fast metal is recommended after any intoxication. However….. I felt well rock’n'roll!
by Sarah on 2006-12-03 at 12:30 pm
I think marihuana is without doubt a “safer” recreational drug than alchohol.
by Tankgirl on 2006-12-04 at 5:55 pm
I agree with Tankgirl about it being safer to use than alcohol. I wish more governments would realize that prohibiting something only makes it nontaxable, and removes all restrictions about who can purchase it.
Prohibition in the US should have made that blindingly obvious. Once prohibition was ended, the government was able to tax the alcohol sold by legitimate businesses, and control who sold it and to whom. They pile extra tax on cigarettes and control their sale almost as closely.
If the government would stop trying to prohibit things, and just control who sold them and to whom they sold it to, then the problem would be far less widespread. People are far less impressed by things that are legal to obtain. The majority of underage cigarette smokers do it more because they’re told they’re not allowed to than for any other reason.
by Random Guy on 2006-12-06 at 2:26 am
Random Guy,
That’s a good (and amazingly obvious) point that a lot of people fail to comprehend.
Interestingly enough, the 73rd anniversary of the repealing of the alcohol prohibition was yesterday. It doesn’t look like the US government has learned many lessons from it’s own history book though.
by Alex on 2006-12-06 at 3:24 am
all illicit grugs should be decriminalized,and handled the same way as the government (australia) handles alcohol and tobacco,there would be alot less crime and probably less use as the “illegal” side of it would not be there
by jewels on 2006-12-09 at 10:18 pm
Thanks for the excellent post.
by Kenny on 2006-12-10 at 2:53 am
All of you from the states should really look into the early NBN and Anslinger work against marihuana. Explains alot
by skOh on 2006-12-11 at 6:50 am
The legal status of cannabis has never had much at all to do with the substance itself, simply a game of politics where the unfortunate weed smokers are receiving collateral damage (not to mention many others). Unfortunately, this game has had tremendous effect on the public, and it is not so easy to tell people that they’ve basically been lied to about how harmful cannabis is.
Eg. the “green” party in .fi had been making some quite favorable comments before the previous elections about legalizing marihuana, but it didn’t take many days for them to find out that their voters were not exactly agreeing all the way, and they turned their boat.
Some years ago, I told my school nurse that smoking weed helps my back aches (caused by a spinal disformation disease). She freaked out and insisted I’d meet a drug council, so I did. Interestingly, the guy had his feet firmly on the ground, and not after long, we were actually discussing more about his work than my habit of choosing weed over alcohol. He told me, that most of his work doesn’t actually revolve around helping drug addicts, but in fact lecturing the authorities and trying to make them understand what drugs really are, and how they should really be dealt with in the society. I could tell by the look on his face, he was not doing so well on that front.
I don’t know where this quote is from, but from my experience, it has a lot of truth in it: When kids are taught that cannabis is as dangerous as heroine, kids learn that heroine is as harmless as cannabis.
by finnpunk on 2006-12-16 at 6:32 am
Alcohol and Cigs are the most dangerous and most profitable. Smoking can impare driving in some people and depends on the dose. Some people tend to day dream specially if there is music playing and that can cause some problems. But I never heard of someone getting in an accident purely due to the effects of marijuana. Just don’t drive when intoxicated traffic is not a fun place to be when high, if you must drive eat something before that will bring you to a more sober state of mind. Enjoy life and make sure others enjoy it too!
by VIctor on 2006-12-17 at 10:42 am
It’s very difficult to know what to do about cannabis use. We’ve got to the stage now where it’s too easy to keep the status quo because the network of vested interests (obvious and not so obvious) easily work against attempts to decriminalise it. The best test case we have so far is Amsterdam, where cannabis use is decriminalised and fairly controlled (as are heroin and other drugs).
Looking at Amsterdam, I think cannabis law in the US and elsewhere is a classic case of intelligent people continuing to do nothing because the vested interests that perpetuate the prohibition make sure such people are not unduly affected. Why, for example, does the NYPD not conduct drug raids on Wall Street when it does do with monotonous regularity in black and other minority areas? The fact that local politicians can keep tax levels down through the sale of impounded property seized while conducting such raids does nothing to stimulate middle-class opposition to the drug war. Here in the UK, it’s thought that police forces can sometimes cover up to a quarter of their total annual expenditure with money received from both government and private anti-drug budgets. If that money dries up, a lot of other problems will float to the surface.
by Jonathan on 2006-12-18 at 2:18 pm
Again, the British Broadcasting Company is shown to be infinitely more concerned with reality rather than what their customers consider truth. When American publishing practices reach even close to their English counterparts, our world will at LEAST be a much SANER place.
by Byron on 2006-12-19 at 2:49 am
I’ve smoked ganja ( 5 joints a day) for 13 years , all while driving,.even working as a pizza delivery driver. I still have a spotless drivers abstract..no traffic violations..go figure!!
by anthont catton on 2006-12-22 at 11:25 pm
I find that smoking while driving makes trips more enjoyable and faster. If I am going to be driving for more than an hour, I always light up. Once stoned I find that my driving capabilities are the same or better than when sober. The only dangerous part is when I need to find my piece and bag to pack another bowl.
by Matt on 2006-12-23 at 5:15 pm
This video only shows what, for me, has been the reality for several years: I can drive the same way being stoned or not. Instead, my father thinks that, to him, driving stoned is far dangerous than driving drunk because weed makes him very absentÂminded. So, all this thing about driving drunk or stoned varies from one person to another and each one should only be responsible for his acts and what they might cause to other people…
by random guy 2 on 2006-12-30 at 9:41 am
People keep saying “intoxicated”. Cannabis DOES NOT intoxicate you with intoxicants. Cannabis is completely non-toxic and the effects produced & felt are natural processes which are induced by consuming cannabis. THC naturally binds to cannabinoid receptors already present in our brains without any ill effect on those receptors.
On the other hand, alcohol is toxic and the effects felt by the user are the effects of having toxicity which (with high doses or repeated abuse) cause damages to almost every physiological system in our bodies. In small amounts, with modesty, it appears that certain alcohols are actually beneficial to our bodies…. but not without risk. Risk of becoming physically dependent on it… a risk which is not present with Cannabis. Caffeine is way more physically addictive than cannabis.
So… please. Quit saying “intoxicate”. It doesn’t truthfully explain cannabis’ effects and it makes it sound bad…. and it’s not and shouldn’t be labeled as such.
P.S.
I drive under the influence of cannabis every day and I have for 10 years. I agree that usually I am more aware of my surroundings and more cautious. There have been rare instances where the effects were too strong and I did not feel comfortable. Therefore, I didn’t take the risk. Thank God… I’ve yet to have any problems from it.
by 4Ganja on 2007-01-06 at 8:48 am
I drove a car while stoned just last night. Luckily I was minimally stoned at the time, because later on when the strong stuff kicked in, driving would have been the most stupid thing for me to do. Even at mild levels, I didn’t feel like I was driving safely.
by Owl on 2007-01-14 at 3:41 am
Sober or not sober, I drive the same. No real difference, except maybe cornering. If I smoke my usual, 8 blunts a day, than im alright, but if I were to smoke after I wake up, or if I had taken something else, i.e. alcohol, prescription pills, etc, than my cornering is impared. I also drive a long truck, so getting that back tire around the corner is a challenge sometimes.
by south FL on 2007-01-24 at 3:25 pm
The only problem I had driving while smoking was being paranoid the police would stop me. And i smoked and drove virtually everyday for 10 years til I recently quit. (I just graduated nursing schhol, and get a job as an RN….worked to hard to be flunking drug tests)
I do believe marijuana would be legalized and heavily regulated/taxed if it weren’t for one thing:
Marijuana was heavily relied on as a medicine for many many years before it was outlawed. With the pharmaceutical companies making all these butt loads of moey off of “new” medicines, they know these meds wouldn’t make it off the ground if marijuana was legalized. Cannabis has many therapeutic effects, including appetite stimulant, mood stabalizer, pain reliever. It helps slow/reverse alzheimers, helps with MS, and parkinson’s disease just to name a few. It’s sad.
by ex-smoker due to job on 2007-02-04 at 3:44 pm
Who needs weed when you can have Jesus!!!
by Christian on 2007-03-12 at 8:56 am
Amen! Jesus is my everyday high
by alsoChristian on 2007-03-12 at 8:59 am
Everyone is different and every area is as well. Just got to be smart about it and do what you know is right. In my area the cops are around almost all the friggin time its annoying. So do i drive and smoke? Nope. I rather just do it in my house and not have to worry about some pig messing up my high and day all together.
by K on 2007-03-13 at 7:09 am
for school we are doing a debate that tabaco should remain leaglised in tamania does anyone have any good things i can say?
by kaity on 2007-04-14 at 8:49 pm
to the christians:
god made weed, man made booze…
who do you trust?
plus jesus is dead, get over it. start thinking about the future… nanotech should be our new religion.
by Atheist on 2007-05-07 at 4:31 pm
31 yrs. cannabis use no one hardly knows . 15yrs alcohol use damn near killed me many many times. But thats just me. I do not drive anymore but I think you all should just lightly toke upwhen driving please, you do not want to injure yourself or someone else. Take care and be safe out there.
by SPACE_ACE on 2007-10-03 at 12:36 am
I have been driving while stoned for years and I’ve never had an accident. I’m much more cautious when I’m driving while stoned and my passengers have commented that I am more in tune with the vehicle. I guess it really depends on the person driving, everyone’s different.
by Jake on 2008-02-21 at 5:14 am